![]() |
|
| Supporting communities through environmental action | |
| Home
|
Youth
and Sustainable Development Conference
16 February 2002 Executive Summary
Youth (below 24 years) comprise nearly 60 per cent of Swaziland’s population. Youth make up one third of the world’s population. It is imperative that the government should advance the role of youth and actively involve them in the protection of the environment and the promotion of economic and social development says Mr. Sahr Tengbeh UNIGEP’s Secretary General. Government needs to come up with policies that will encourage youth participation in sustainable development issues he said. Youth highlighted that they cannot work on sustainable development initiatives in isolation but need to link up with other local, regional and global youth partners. Youth should work with the Swaziland National Youth Council (SNYC) a forum for youth development in Swaziland said Mr. Zolile Dlamini, a representative from SNYC. Today’s youth are tomorrow’s leaders and decision makers hence it is important for the youth to be involved in sustainable development processes. Youth reiterated the need to be involved in the preparations for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) to held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002 because decisions that are going to be made at this conference will affect their lives today and in future. This conference was the beginning of many such interventions that Yonge Nawe is planning to coordinate for different stakeholders in Swaziland. Such interventions will be used as evidence of Yonge Nawe’s support of sustainable development issues. Yonge Nawe wants to popularize the concept of sustainable development in Swaziland, especially among community - based organizations, other NGOs and development agencies, the youth and general public. This particular intervention was also meant to assist the youth in getting their voices and contributions in community development heard. Yonge Nawe strongly believes in active involvement of the youth in development since the youth are tomorrow’s leaders. OVERALL OBEJCTIVE The purpose of the conference was to create a platform for the participants to share their understanding of the concept of sustainable development and illustrate how they were engaged in sustainable development activities. IMMEDIATE OBJECTIVES: By the end of the conference participants would have:
Mr. Simanga Ntando opened the conference and welcomed participants. This was followed by introductions of Yonge Nawe delegates, SNTC delegate and UNIGEP delegates. PRESENTATIONS: a. Sustainable Development path by Yonge Nawe The conference began with a powerful presentation delivered by Joseph Mutsigwa of Yonge Nawe. Mr. Mutsigwa gave a broad historical background to Sustainable Development beginning from the very first meeting held by different heads of states and government in 1987. Mr. Mutsigwa discussed the various protocols entered to by the heads of states and government prior to the Rio 1992 Summit and after. The historical background went as far as developments in the area of sustainable development 10 years after Rio 1992. In conclusion Mr. Mutsigwa made reference to preparatory meetings leading up to the Johannesburg Summit coming in August 2002. Mr. Mutsigwa illustrated how different countries’ civil society and other stakeholders have failed in moving towards sustainable development. b. Government’s contributions towards sustainable development by SNTC The Yonge Nawe’s presentation was followed by Mr. Bheki Thusi who works for the Swaziland National Trust Commission (SNTC). Mr. Thusi’s presentation was focused on government’s contributions towards sustainable development. With the framework that had been made by Mr. Mutsigwa, it was interesting to hear how government was failing to put in place policies and other structures that support sustainable development. In his presentation Mr. Thusi illustrated sustainable development within the following classification, “ green”,” brown” and “red issues.” “Green” issues were alluded to ecological issues, while “brown” to air pollution and waste management and related issues and “red” to gender and related issues. Mr. Thusi further discussed threats facing Swaziland and challenged participants to come up with sustainable development means of addressing these issues. The threatening issues Mr. Thusi made reference to included among others, poverty, HIV/AIDS, water demand and supply, and energy. c. The role of Youth in sustainable development by UNIGEP Mr Sahr Tengbeh, the Secretary General of UNIGEP, made the last presentation. He gave the youth’s views on sustainable development. Basically the youth feel that they need to be involved more in issues of development. Their feeling is that at the moment there aren’t any structures and avenues at their disposal to express their views on development. The students also felt that they needed to be supported with empowerment programmes to give them the skills to communicate, organize and network among themselves. Due to time constraints, a very shot time was provided for questions at the end of the presentations. Also, the participants were still a little stiff and needed something to loosen them up. The facilitator moved the process to group discussions, which was thought to be a god way of initiating dialogue among the participants. The participants were divided into four groups averaging ten people per group and given two issues, namely poverty and HIV/AIDS to discuss. The guiding questions thrown to the groups were as follows:
After 30 minutes of heated discussions the groups came back from plenary and it was time for group presentations. Even before getting the groups back into the larger group, it was interesting to note that there was more dialogue among the students in the smaller groups compared to when they were in the large group. The Yonge Nawe team had distributed itself among the four groups and giving guidance on progress. Here are responses that came from the four groups regarding the two questions that were posed to each group. a) POVERTY
- Contributing money, food and clothes to the poor - Involved in fund-raising activities on behalf of the poor - Building shelter for the poor - Putting up fencing around homes for the poor - Providing food and fun days for orphaned children - Assisting during times of natural disasters - Intervening in environmental issues e. g. erosion and agricultural activities - Soliciting and securing sponsors for small community projects aimed at benefiting the poor It was interesting to note that one of the groups said they were not doing anything to alleviate the situation of poverty. When asked to give reasons for their inactivity they cited the following constraints:
- To mobilize youth to form
clubs and or associations
b) HIV/AIDS
- Distributing condoms in our institutions - Counseling HIV/AIDS patients - Providing home care services - Challenging other religious sects to discuss HIV/AIDS issues openly - Working on behavior change for the youth relation to STDs and HIV/AIDS issues - Working with affected people
- Allow infected people to join existing youth clubs CONCLUSION
|
![]() |
|
||||