![]() |
|
| Supporting communities through environmental action | |
| Home
|
PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING
12 December 2005 Public review and comments Public review and comments of Environmental Assessment ( EA) reports is another level where there are some worrying observations. Public review and comments is a requirement stated in the Environmental Audit and Assessment Review Regulations (EAARR) (2000), which project proponents, should comply with. The public should make its input by reviewing the reports, commenting and or making objections to the proposed project. The reports are distributed at "strategic places." In some cases, the seemingly "strategic places,"showed no knowledge of the existence of the reports while others did not know what the report was about and or what they were supposed to do with it? At Sigwe Inkhundla, for example, the recipient of the EA reports of the then proposed Ferro-vanadium Plant at Maloma did not know what to do with the report let alone understand the contains of the report. This brings us to another interesting observation. Some EA reports use technical language, which even a competent English reader would not understand. However, this may not be done deliberately because the nature of business warrants one to use such language. But the challenge is how do we reach joint agreement and acceptance of the proposed project when we are not on the same understanding level about the production processes involved let alone how these will impact on my health and the environment? In last week’s column we made reference to reports about "poison scares" at the plant mentioned above. Do you think this situation would have obtained if affected parties fully understood the production environment they are working under? Further, one would be keen to know whether affected parties honestly participate in decisions that will impact their lives. We have read cases in the local
newspapers of challenges, for example, the Mlawula case where EA process
was not subjected to public participation. This situation did not promote
participatory environmental decision-making between the project proponent
and affected parties neither did it cultivate support for and trust in
the proposed development project.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN
ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING
Communities will be safer,
cleaner, stronger and happier as residents increase their participation
in making decisions in matters that concern their lives. Public participation
is a process through which the public can influence, share control over
development initiatives and the decisions and resources, which affect them.
Public participation in environmental decision-making is one very important
area, which has an impact on our lives.
Local observations
Environmental Assessment
scoping meeting
Where To Access Environmental
Information
Last week we discussed the right to access environmental information, and why this is crucial to sustainable development. We would like to share with you other ways for accessing information on the environmental decisions and development plans, which affect you. Statutory Public Consultations
It is during this period that the general public has their greatest opportunity to affect development decisions. Public places where documents are displayed always include the Swaziland Environmental Authority (SEA), the National Libraries in Mbabane and Manzini and UNISWA Libraries. Additional locations could include police stations or civic buildings in the vicinity of the site of the proposed project. Swaziland Environmental
Authority Resource Centre
· Copies of Swazi Environmental
Legislation and Policy documents;
UNISWA
Yonge Nawe Information Services
Improving our Information
Service
We want your views on how we can improve our Information Service. Over the coming weeks will be undertaking a survey of our members and partners on this topic. In the meantime, if you have any suggestions as to how we can improve our Information Service, please get in touch at the address below. Watch this column for subsequent
articles on sustainable development issues in Swaziland.
Public access to environmental
information promotes sustainable Development
Has it ever dawned on you that when the government fails to give environmental information to the public, it is shooting itself in the foot because without this information we can hardly achieve sustainable development? All citizens involved in national development can hardly achieve sustainable development without access to information and participation. Public participation is crucial. It is a cornerstone of sustainable development and of progressive environmental management. With public participation we benefit from better development decisions and ultimately less conflict between developers and the affected public. Most importantly, public participation builds the capacity of communities to address their own environmental challenges. Governments should therefore facilitate easy access to information in order to promote effective participation by citizens in matters that concern them. Similarly, it is important for citizens to seek and act upon information that will improve the quality of their lives. Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development: Principle 10
Justification of access
to environmental information
Information relating to environmental, occupational health and safety standards is critical especially to the protection and prolonging of human immunity within the workplace. More often than not workers experience difficulties in accessing this and yet company authorities are legally required to give workers access to this very important information. When company authorities do not release the information, workers depend on representative bodies such as such labour unions, associations and committees as alternative sources of such information. Unfortunately, where such groupings are either not allowed or suppressed it becomes even more difficult to access and or communicate information of concern to them. Invariably, people living side by side an industry that is releasing emissions into the air, should be able to access information on the effects of these emissions on their health and the environment. The Limits of managing parks
without the people
Rural communities from all over the world are gentle giants whose rights to benefit from natural resources are often not observed or are only given for political, conservation and development reasons. Last time we used Namibia’s approach to community based tourism as an example of how governments could help communities benefit from local resources. Community rights to natural
resource use
When our governments find it difficult to persuade the international community to allow them to for example to engage in strictly controlled international trade in raw ivory that several southern African countries continue to stockpile; they use the need for poor African rural communities to use the money to alleviate poverty and promote conservation as a powerful argument which many find difficult to go against. What this shows is that these communities are gentle giants who only need to demand their rights to benefit from their natural resources, working with strategically placed partners such as NGOs, including the international community which sympathises with them. The concept of community-based tourism in southern Africa is homegrown but did not come on a silver platter (was not just an easy-take). In fact some observers of community-based tourism argue that the driving force behind the concept was primarily conservation and not community development. Congratulated
"I used to be a poacher," unashamedly said Chief Luckson Masule of Botswana’s Chobe Enclave, 80 kilometres from Kasane Town in a recent interview. "I was almost shot by game rangers but hid behind a shrub but now I am the champion of anti-poaching in my Community (The Chobe Enclave) because wildlife has become our property just like our cows and goats." How can communities demand
rights to natural resource use?
The limits of managing parks
without people (continued from last time )
Last time we ended with an appeal that efforts should be made to help local communities to benefit from their local resources. This week we would like to show how governments could help communities benefit from local resources by using Namibia’s approach to community based tourism. Enabling policy and law
The policy also allows rural communities on state land to undertake tourism ventures, and to enter into co-operative agreements with commercial tourism organisations to develop tourism activities on state land. The policy on wildlife and tourism on communal land makes provision for rural communities, which form a conservancy to be given the same rights over wildlife as a commercial farmer. In order to put into effect the policy on Wildlife Management, Utilisation and Tourism on Communal land, Namibia later introduced a Nature Conservation and Amendment Act in 1996. The Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1996 (Act 5 of 1996) amends the Nature Conservation Ordinance so that residents of communal areas can gain the same rights over wildlife and tourism as commercial farmers. According to the Act any group of persons residing on communal land may apply to the Minister of Environment and Tourism to have the area they inhabit or part of that area declared a conservancy. Results from community involvement
in tourism business
The limits of managing parks
without people ( continued from last week)
Last week we asked the central question: Can the parks without people management approach that some African countries are still clinging to help them environmental sustainability by 2015? As long as southern African countries and other countries worldwide continue to manage national parks or game reserves without involving neighbouring rural communities, their conservation efforts will remain limited. In countries where communities are not involved in conservation and benefit sharing of natural resources from protected areas, communities surrounding parks view the parks as the property of the government and private sector. Why? One cannot claim ownership over resources that they are not allowed to manage or benefit from. Their lives are worsened by ongoing and uncompensated wildlife-related crop destruction, killing of livestock and the ultimate price of loss of one’s life or that of a loved one. Managing parks without involving communities living next to them is a conservation disaster because without benefits, residents from these areas are more inclined to collaborate with poachers of both wildlife and medicinal plants found in the parks. In the end it is the governments and wildlife that lose. It is against this background of failure to win cooperation from communities that governments and conservationists from all over the world endorsed the community Benefits Beyond Boundaries conservation concept at the 5th World Parks Congress, held in Durban South Africa in September 2003. This concept supports the need for communities to co-manage parks with park officials and also to benefit from park resources through sustainable use. The results from countries such as Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe and to some extent Mozambique and South Africa, which implemented and continue to implement the incentive-based conservation and development approach, are impressive. This incentive-based conservation and development approach is popularly known as Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM). It acknowledges that rural communities should benefit from natural resources found in their area, including wildlife and that these resources should be utilised sustainably. Through CBNRM projects such as community tourism projects are being run through partnerships between communities and the private sector. They run projects such as sport hunting and cultural tourism. Communities that never used to see money left by tourists who visited their area are beginning to receive and use this money. They are also using it to lift themselves out of poverty associated with African communities. These communities are also very conscious of the need to conserve resources they are benefiting from. They are using revenue generated from their tourism projects to create employment opportunities. In Swaziland, Shewula Community Nature Reserve is one such initiative. An effort should be made to assist communities establish their own locally based reserves. Back to Newspaper Columns Back to Press Information |
![]() |
|
||||